No-Code/Low-Code Platforms are website and application builders that allow users to create functional digital products without extensive programming knowledge. Instead of constructing a house brick by brick (coding), no-code platforms provide prefabricated structures that you can customize and arrange to suit your needs.
Advantages:
Free and easy to use, with a drag-and-drop editor.
No coding required, making it accessible for beginners.
Integrates seamlessly with Google Drive, Docs, Forms, Slides, and Calendar.
Fast and reliable hosting.
Automatic mobile-friendly
Disadvantages:
Limited design flexibility – templates are basic and not highly customizable.
No advanced features – lacks dynamic pages, databases, or GIS integrations.
Advantages:
Drag-and-drop builders with better design flexibility than Google Sites.
No coding required, but Wix offers custom code options for added functionality.
Built-in blogging, contact forms, forum, protected pages, and user-login (Wix)
Supports CMS (Content Management System)
Squarespace offers strong visual aesthetics, great for branding.
Disadvantages:
Less scalable for complex projects requiring databases or custom integrations.
Subscription-based – ongoing costs for hosting and premium features.
Wix has performance issues with overly complex designs
Squarespace has a learning curve for custom styling.
Advantages:
Offers full design control without needing deep coding knowledge.
More flexible and powerful than Wix or Squarespace for custom layouts.
Supports CMS (Content Management System)
Can integrate third-party tools, such as GIS maps and databases.
Disadvantages:
Steeper learning curve – requires knowledge of web design principles.
More expensive than Wix/Squarespace for advanced features.
Limited built-in engagement tools – needs third-party plugins for surveys, forums, or discussions.
Advantages:
No-code development for building web applications, not just static sites.
Supports dynamic pages and databases, ideal for interactive planning tools.
Can integrate GIS, dashboards, and public engagement features with APIs.
Scalable for more advanced urban planning applications (e.g., community input dashboards, crowdsourced data tools).
Disadvantages:
Significant learning curve compared to traditional website builders.
Slower performance for highly complex applications.
Hosting and scalability costs can be high for advanced features.